The Pardu

Archive for December 17th, 2011|Daily archive page

Oh Really, O’Reilly?

In "fair and balanced", Beck, Bill O'Reilly, Fox News, GOP propaganda, Most popular cable news show on December 17, 2011 at 11:22 PM

The following post has been duplicated on The Progressive Influence. Mmetrics1′s posts are part of the “Talent Place for Special People ‘ Page. 


Posted by mmetrics1

I was channel-surfing last night, jumping back-and-forth from watching sports to the O’Reilly Factor during commercials. Given my interest in media bias, it was as if cosmic forces were at work. Let me explain…
The first time I tuned into “the Factor,” O’Reilly was doing his Talking Points segment. He was once again railing about OWS protesters, who this time had the temerity to interrupt a public speech by Newt Gingrich. Bill made some pretty interesting assertions, such as:
  • “The protesters are being used as point people by some in the Democratic party.”
  • “Recently, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) praised the protesters, despite all the problems they have caused.”
As I took this in, I thought of some recently-read passages in the book Blur, by Tom Rosenstieland Bill Kovach, in which they discuss the “Journalism of Verification.” In the past, newspapers editors like the Washington Posts Ben Bradlee enforced a “two-source” rule to corroborate information from anonymous sources. Similarly, the City News Bureau of Chicago became famous for an axiom that captured the journalistic skepticism of the old tutors lurking there: “Kid, if your mother says she loves you, check it out.”
So I kept waiting for some form of verification. Anything. But nothing came. Eventually, I zapped my way back to my sporting event.
During the next commercial break, I flipped back to the O’Reilly Factor, this time catching Bill debating with Glenn Beck about Newt Gingrich. Beck had recently had Newt on his radio show, and based on their discussion, he was adamant that Gingrich “believes in big government.” O’Reilly countered by saying, “That’s your interpretation. He didn’t say it. You are interpreting that, Beck.”
In this instance, Bill may have been right, but how is interpretation OK when he does it, but not when someone else does???
I’m not here to demand that O’Reilly stop positioning himself as the ultimate arbiter of political news. People rail on him and Fox News every day, and they continue to dominate the ratings, crank out profits, and cater to their loyal viewers. To those viewers, however, I would simply ask that you acknowledge what you are absorbing. Watching The O’Reilly Factor — despite  the  “No Spin Zone” tag line — is not “the News.” It’s Bill O’Reilly’s interpretation of it … his opinion. Basically, he’s telling you what to think.
O’Reilly can do that. It’s his right, as well as Fox’s. And, like eating a tasty-but-unhealthy meal, it is equally your right to accept what is being delivered …
… so long as you know what you’re getting.
Remember to  visit: www.Mediametrics.wordpress.com

Public Swimming Pool…. Whites Only (State’s Rights Anyone?)

In Information, Political Profiles and Exposition, Political Rant on December 17, 2011 at 9:58 PM

1955? (NO) 1960?(NO) 1965?(NO) 2011 (YES)!!!

The 24/7 cable news channels (with a possible exception for one such network) are running a story about a Cincinnati, Ohio ‘landlord’.  The building owner may have violated federal  Fair Housing Laws and possibly violated other Civil Liberties laws.  The landlord was found on the wrong side of equal opportunity laws for hanging a sign near a swimming pool that read “Whites Only”. Apparently, Ms. Jamie Hein feels that the equal rights commission’s ruling of  ’guilt’ was wrong; she is appealing the ruling.

Details about the case ‘so’ remind of days long past.  Even more tragic is how anyone in the nation could feel our world has changed such that it is acceptable to so blatantly practice racism and overt ‘PROPERTY OWNER” right to segregate people. (Caps for Congressmen Ron and Rand Paul).  Regardless of your perception of the  following details or my perception of the details, Hein is a racist.  Her actions are no different from the ‘in-your-face’ (state’s rights) racism and discrimination of segregationist like Lester Maddox (Georgia) George Wallace (Alabama), J. P. Coleman (Mississippi), Luther Hodges (North Carolina), and Leroy Collins (Florida). She made the decision to restrict the interaction among people based solely on race or related issues that separate people based on race.

Times NEWS FEED…. (details from this past June)

Read the rest of this entry »

Public Swimming Pool…. Whites Only (State’s Rights Anyone?)

In Jamie Hein, Ohio, Racist acts 2011, Rand Paul, Ron Paul, state's equalrights commission, State's Rights, Whites Only pool on December 17, 2011 at 7:12 PM

1955? (NO) 1960?(NO) 1965?(NO) 2011 (YES)!!!

The 24/7 cable news channels (with a possible exception for one such network) are running a story about a Cincinnati, Ohio ‘landlord’.  The building owner may have violated federal  Fair Housing Laws and possibly violated other Civil Liberties laws.  The landlord was found on the wrong side of equal opportunity laws for hanging a sign near a swimming pool that read “Whites Only”. Apparently, Ms. Jamie Hein feels that the equal rights commission’s ruling of ‘guilt’ was wrong; she is appealing the ruling.

Details about the case ‘so’ remind of days long past.  Even more tragic is how anyone in the nation could feel our world has changed such that it is acceptable to so blatantly practice racism and overt ‘PROPERTY OWNER” right to segregate people. (Caps for Congressmen Ron and Rand Paul).  Regardless of your perception of the  following details or my perception of the details, Hein is a racist.  Her actions are no different from the ‘in-your-face’ (state’s rights) racism and discrimination of segregationist like Lester Maddox (Georgia) George Wallace (Alabama), J. P. Coleman (Mississippi), Luther Hodges (North Carolina), and Leroy Collins (Florida). She made the decision to restrict the interaction among people based solely on race or related issues that separate people based on race.

Times NEWS FEED…. (details from this past June)



The landlord, Jamie Hein, posted the sign on a fence near the pool when an African-American teen was visiting her parents, who were then living in a duplex owned by Hein. After seeing the “Public Swimming Pool, White Only” sign, the parents filed a discrimination charge with the state civil rights commission and moved out of the duplex to “avoid subjecting their family to further humiliating treatment,” the commission said in a release announcing its finding. The Ohio Civil Rights Commission determined that Hein, who is white, violated the Ohio Civil Rights Act by posting the sign at the pool.
Hein, however, disagrees. As reported by the Associated Press, she claimed that she only posted the sign to prevent the chemicals in the girl’s hair products from rendering the pool “cloudy.” Somehow the commission managed to see past that statement and concluded that the posting of such a sign “restricts the social interaction between Caucasians and African-Americans and reinforces discriminatory actions aimed at oppressing people of color.”
The  state’s rights commission ruled against Ms. Hein’s ‘cloudy water’ defense.  In an effort to avoid a ‘cease and desist’ order and punitive damages, Hein is appealing the ruling from another angle.

Now, imagine that, another angle.

Many writers are commenting about the obvious attempt to restrict the free movement of people and interactions between people of different races. I thought it might be a little different experience if I share a few of cases of discrimination against me. Of course, there are thousands of cases (without exaggeration) but these three are forever emblazoned in my mind.

I. As a boy who was raised in deep southern Arkansas, I was allowed to ride with my mother to shop. I must have been around three to four years of age. I was most definitely not yet five years of age.  One Saturday,  Mom and I parked near the rear “Colored Entrance” of an S. S. Kresge’s store.  After entering the store, Mom must have gone about her shopping while I (as little ones will do) wandered off towards a curious water-fountain. The fountain had a sign above; I  could not read the sign, of course.  I remember using a set of child steps to get up to the drinking area, pushing the dispenser button and taking a drink.  My Mom immediately removed us from the store; our shopping was over.  I eventually realized (many years later) what the sign must have read.

II. What would my young have been without a dad who would, on occasion, take me to the movie? He would drive, he and I only, 27 miles to a decent movie theater in Magnolia Arkansas. The movie theater in our hometown was a complete dump Quonset Hut movie theater for ‘Blacks”.

III. Many years later and after joining the U.S. Air Force, I was stationed in Biloxi, MS.  Just before Christmas 1967, our training flight lieutenant called all black airmen together for a meeting. He informed us that the Christmas Party was not open for black airmen as it was being held downtown and the establishment owner refused to admit black patrons.  I still do not believe the story. I believe someone in our chain-of-command capriciously practiced segregation and decided that we should not attend the party. Oh, and I will never forget that man’s face.

For those who tend to label U.S. bigotry and racism an issue which was (or is) geographically a ‘southern’ problem, note Hein lives in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Many seem to feel this issue is singularly one of Ms. Hein. I do not totally disagree as most people are far less open with their racism. We should make no mistake, however, our current socio/political climate feeds instances of overt racism.  It is a climate which has been carefully and effectively introduced and nurture by the political Right dating back to Ronald Reagan.  If you undertake a bit of research, you will find that hate crimes jumped exponentially after Jimmy Carter left the Oval Office.

In a book entitled, Hate Crimes: criminal law & identity politics James B. Jacobs and Kimberly Potter, reference the earlier work of author Alphonso Pinkney, Lest we Forget: White Hate Crime.  Pinkney briefly mentions Ronald Reagan’s contribution to  increases in hate crimes during the 1980s (pages 53 and 54). In fairness, I will state that our nation certainly has experience with black on white hate crimes, but the article is not focused in that direction. Hein did not deny entry to the pool to a young white child.

The birth of neo-segregationist have also contributed to a soiled political spectrum that has people (black and white) voting based on social paradigms equal to their concern for the nations overall well-being. It is often hard to discern which carries the most weight in voting decisions.

My hat is off to the parents who decided to report the segregationist act to the state’s equal rights commission. The only way to stop such acts is for agencies with authority to enforce laws perform extinguishing interventions. Intervene when  and do so effectively.

I was asked recently what the term “extinguishing intervention‘ meant. “Extinguishing intervention”: focused actions to stop unacceptable actions.

I wonder how the Ron Paul and Rand Paul feel about Ms. Hein?

 State’s Rights anyone?

Mario Piperni: John McCain’s Never-Ending War

In GOTP, McCain, McCain sour grapes, Piperni, War-monger on December 17, 2011 at 10:54 AM

John McCain is still having problems accepting his 2008 defeat.
“It is clear that this decision of a complete pullout of United States troops from Iraq was dictated by politics, and not our national security interests,” said McCain from the Senate floor. “I believe history will judge this president’s leadership with the scorn and disdain it deserves.”

Seventy percent of Americans think otherwise.  That’s the number who agree with the President on the troop withdrawal.  But it’s a moot point anyway.  Iraqis wanted the U.S. out of their country.  Couple that with the 2008 agreement President Bush signed with Iraq which set the withdrawal date at December 31 2011 and there was little President Obama could have done even if he wanted to stay in Iraq for another “100 years”. (Remember McCain in the 2008 campaign stating how he’d have no problem keeping U.S. troops in for another 100 years?)
Get over it, John.  You lost.  Obama won.  You got your surge.  Iraq war is over.  But hey, if one of your boys wins next November, you’ll have the Iran war you’ve always wanted to keep you amused.
In the meantime, go plant a garden.
___
Follow MarioPiperniDotCom on FacebookTwitter and Google+.

Leadership in the Face of Jingoism and Ring-Wing Fanaticism

In GOP Obstructionsim, History and Remembrance, Information, Political Rant on December 17, 2011 at 9:42 AM

President Obama visited fort Bragg this week to president over the nation’s most historical and relevant event since his inauguration in 2009. He declared the war in Iraq, “over”. He gloriously and in a most presidential way,  ’welcomed home our troops’ (from that war).  Yet, there is a segment in the population who have taken their obstructionism to the point of disgust: many of our nation’s conservatives (politicians and war-mongering citizens).

The current wave of ‘hawkish’ diatribes from the likes of John McCain and Lindsey Graham speaks to the avid jingoistic foundation for many of the nation’s conservatives.  The current cast of GOP presidential candidates include at least one or two ‘super war hawks’ who have spoken in open debate about their disdain for US troop withdrawal from Iraq.   If you watch the GOP debates you are hearing resounding applause with mention of possible jingoistic actions against Iran. The audience seems chops-at-the-bit for another war. Yet, only their children will fight their war.

Both Fox News and certain news segments on CNN have included comment which rational thought and smacks misrepresentation of our past.  The words flow along this line (Paraphrase), “Saddam was removed from power, democracy was established in the nation…”  How can respectful people so misrepresent the war in Iraq. The removal of Saddam or establishing democracy in the nation were items taken before the United Nations for authorization of war.  Such non-factual ’reverse rationalization’ by any media is pathetic.  We were duped into the war by a commonly used conservative tactic called “fear”. WMD and a Saddam nuclear weapon was the rallying cry.  a rallying cry delivered to the United nations by one of our greatest and most honored military leaders.  Collin Powell was duped along with you and me.

Read the rest of this entry »

Leadership in the Face of Jingoism and Ring-Wing Fanaticism

In "Cain "tired", Barack H. Obama, Boehner, Bush, Cantor, Cheney, Generation, GOP Debates, Jingoist, Lindsey Graham, McConnell, Rumsfeld, Tenet on December 17, 2011 at 9:31 AM



President Obama visited fort Bragg this week to president over the nation’s most historical and relevant event since his inauguration in 2009. He declared the war in Iraq, “over”. He gloriously and in a most presidential way,  ’welcomed home our troops’ (from that war).  Yet, there is a segment in the population who have taken their obstructionism to the point of disgust: many of our nation’s conservatives (politicians and war-mongering citizens).

The current wave of ‘hawkish’ diatribes from the likes of John McCain and Lindsey Graham speaks to the avid jingoistic foundation for many of the nation’s conservatives.  The current cast of GOP presidential candidates include at least one or two ‘super war hawks’ who have spoken in open debate about their disdain for US troop withdrawal from Iraq.   If you watch the GOP debates you are hearing resounding applause with mention of possible jingoistic actions against Iran. The audience seems chops-at-the-bit for another war. Yet, only their children will fight their war.

Both Fox News and certain news segments on CNN have included comment which rational thought and smacks misrepresentation of our past.  The words flow along this line (Paraphrase), “Saddam was removed from power, democracy was established in the nation…”  How can respectful people so misrepresent the war in Iraq. The removal of Saddam or establishing democracy in the nation were items taken before the United Nations for authorization of war.  Such non-factual ’reverse rationalization’ by any media is pathetic.  We were duped into the war by a commonly used conservative tactic called “fear”. WMD and a Saddam nuclear weapon was the rallying cry.  a rallying cry delivered to the United nations by one of our greatest and most honored military leaders.  Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Tenet duped Collin Powell along with you and me.


Time has moved on!

The end of a nine-year war that contributed greatly to national economic ruination is reason applause and welcoming our troops home. But, for the Right, not the case.

Ah, another mark against President Obama. I have heard the words ‘timid’ all too often of late.  The GOP candidates are even using the ‘buzzword’ as fodder against each other. After all, it is election season and well-time for conservative politicians to romance the-war-loving psyches of their sycophant followers.

Of course, John “I LOVE WAR” McCain would take the lead.
USA Today…. (THE OVAL)
McCain, speaking from the floor of the U.S. Senate, said Obama’s decision on a full withdrawal — with no residual force behind — was timed to the start of the 2012 presidential election, and leaves Iraq vulnerable to terrorists and to anti-U.S. neighbors like Iran.
“I believe that history will judge this president’s leadership with the scorn and disdain it deserves,” McCain said.
“……..History will judge this president’s leadership with the scorn and disdain it deserves”.  How amazingly sad to think McCain could have become President of the United States!  so soon he forgets his party’s commitment to leaving Iraq.

A Reflection on the Erratic State of the GOP

Just before the end of calendar year 2008 George Bush and the Iraqi government signed the Iraqi war  Statues of Forces Agreement (SOFA). The agreement included a withdrawal date of US Troops by December 31, 2011.  The Obama Administration ended US troop involvement in Iraq two weeks prior to the Agreement date (end date).  We should remember the Iraqi Government would not grant the US certain protections that our government  requested for continuing in Iraq beyond December, 31. I believe that President Obama and the Defense department wanted to maintain a small security force in country.  The Iraqi government wanted an end to the continued US presence. A kerfuffle ended by Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.  Before addressing the current jingoistic action from Congressional conservatives (and pundits), I’d like to reflect on a few relevant considerations.

Bush agreed to timeline for withdrawal from Iraq
Iraq and U.S. agree that all U.S. forces will withdraw “no later than December 31, 2011.” On November 17, 2008, US and Iraqi officials signed a Security Agreement, often referred to as a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA), stating that “All the United States Forces shall withdraw from all Iraqi territory no later than December 31, 2011.” The agreement also called for all U.S. combat forces to withdraw from Iraqi cities “no later than June 30, 2009.” [U.S.-Iraq Status of Forces Agreement,11/17/08]
Am I correct in recalling a moderate number of Congressional representatives joined John McCain, in his 99% support for Bush’s policies, as he campaigned for the 2008 election? Despite the fact Bush signed the agreement few weeks before he left the White House, he clearly negotiated the timed withdrawal.

During the most sever economic times since the Great Depression and despite public support for coming out of the wars (80% support for ending the wars), Conservative across the nation and most in Congress ridicule our withdrawal.  Often, people need simple facts to make a point. the following information makes that very point.

$3.7 trillion
Minimum total cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, according to the Brown University research project Costs of War. “Even small chunks” of that amount “could power many efforts at home,” says Robert Johnson at Business Insider. 

$12,000
Cost that figure boils down to per American 

$27,041
Average per capita income in the United States for twelve months,according to the U.S. Census Bureau
$9.7 billion
Amount, per month, on average, the efforts in Afghanistan and Iraq are costing the U.S., as of late April, according to Defense Department figures 

$27.4 billion
Annual budget of the State Department 

$1.5 billion
Cost of the final shuttle mission in July. NASA could have launched the shuttle “six times for what the Pentagon is allotted to spend each month in those two wars,” says Youssef at McClatchy Newspapers. 
$20 billion
Annual air-conditioning costs for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, according to retired brigadier general Steven Anderson, a former chief logistician for Gen. David Petraeus in Iraq 

$385 billion
Estimated cost of George W. Bush’s 2003 expansion of Medicare prescription drug benefits over 10 years. “The Pentagon spends that in Iraq and Afghanistan in about 40 months,” says Youssef. 

$350 billion
Amount the debt ceiling agreement calls for the Defense Department to cut over the next ten years 

$500 billion
Additional cuts the Pentagon would face if the super committee deadlocks or fails to have its plan approved by Congress. Those cuts are part of a prearranged set of drastic spending cuts that would be automatically triggered if the committee fails to come up with a plan to cut the deficit by an additional $1.2 trillion. “This kind of massive cut across the board, which would literally double the number of cuts that we’re confronting, would have devastating effects on our national defense,” says U.S. Defense Secretary Leon  Panetta. 

$14.6 trillion
U.S national debt 

1,626
Number of U.S. military troops that have died in Afghanistan,according to the Associated Press 

4,474
Number that have died in Iraq since the war began in 2003

Yet, McCain wanted to leave thousands of troops in Iraq. Does the nation really need to leave another standing army (battalion or even platoon) in another foreign country?
Countries in which the U.S. has a military presence in 2007.
  More than 1,000 US personnel
  More than 100 US personnel
  Use of military facilities

The cost of such standing armies is phenomenal.   Click this link for a startling set of data.  Take note of our expenditures matched against China.



Sample


Horrible isn’t it?

Yet, McCain, Graham, GOP presidential candidates (except for Ron Paul) and many millions conservatives are ridiculing President Obama for his leadership.

These same people are unwilling to tax the nation’s wealthy to help defray the cost of such expenditures.  How sad a commentary!

We cannot fund Medicare for indefinite solvency, we are looking to hack away at Medicaid, Social Security eligibility needs to be raised and we have ‘The Path to Prosperity” from the GOP.  Now, take another look at the red bar chart just above.  Really, we need to take all fo those measures.

American jingoism must go away as surely as an eradicated plague.
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 94 other followers