The Pardu

June 2015 Jobs Report

In Betsey Stevenson, Council of Economic Advisers, Jobs By Industry, Private Sector Jobs, The Employment Situation in June on July 3, 2015 at 10:09 AM

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({}); var icx_publication_id = ‘14291’; var icx_copyright_notice = ‘2014 TheProgressiveInfluence’;

Each month President Obama’s  Council of Economic Advisers publishes a in depth review of the previous month’s jobs data. June was a good month for job creation, but experts bemoan the 223,000 new jobs as below expectation. The lowest unemployment rate sine before the Great (Bush) Recession of 5.3% was dismissed as an indicator of people leaving the workforce, vs a real dip in form the previous month’s 5.6 percent unemployment. 

The White House employment post for June 2015 was developed and published by Betsy Stevenson. It reads in a very positive way, regardless of economist lack of glee regarding the numbers. The report follows in its entirety. If you decide to read the full page, consider accomplishing the a reading with regard to the very undesirable& alternative of jobs loss or no jobs gains.
Betsey Stevenson: Jobs June 2015…..

The Employment Situation in June

The economy added 223,000 jobs in June as the unemployment rate fell to 5.3 percent. Our economy has now added 5.6 million jobs over the past two years, the strongest two-year job growth since 2000. But despite this progress, there is more work to do. We must continue to build on the positive trends underlying our economy by ensuring that Americans working overtime receive a fair day’s pay,opening new markets for U.S. goods and services through expanded tradeincreasing investments in infrastructureproviding relief from the sequester, and raising the minimum wage.
1. The private sector has added 12.8 million jobs over 64 straight months of job growth, extending the longest streak on record. Today we learned that total nonfarm employment rose by 223,000 in June—and all those jobs came from the private sector. Although total job growth was revised down somewhat in April and May, much of the revision is attributable to lower government employment than previously estimated. On the whole, our economy has added 2.9 million new jobs over the past twelve months, near the fifteen-year high achieved in February.
2. The labor force grew more slowly in June than it normally does at this time of year, reducing the seasonally adjusted labor force participation rate. June is normally a seasonally strong month for labor force growth, as many new graduates and summer workers enter the labor force. Over the past sixty years, the labor force has grown by 1.8 percent in June on average before seasonal adjustment—more than three times faster than May, the next fastest month. But this June, the labor force only rose 0.4 percent. Accordingly, the labor force contracted on a seasonally adjusted basis, reducing the labor force participation rate. 
One contributing factor was the timing of the “reference week”—the week for which households report their labor force status in the Current Population Survey. Each month, the reference week is the Sunday-to-Saturday period that includes the 12th day of the month. Last month, the 12thwas a Friday, pushing the reference week earlier in the month than normal. Accordingly, a smaller fraction of June’s labor force gains were likely captured in this year’s survey than in prior Junes. In fact, since 1955, June labor force growth has averaged 2.0 percent when the 12th has been a Sunday, Monday, or Tuesday, but only 1.7 percent when the 12th has been a Thursday, Friday, or Saturday. That 0.3 percentage-point gap alone represents nearly 500,000 members of the labor force.
3. Since the recession, both the number of workers who work overtime and the number of average overtime hours they work have increased. Both the number of people working more than 40 hours a week and the number of average hours worked over 40 reached their low in early 2010, but have since rebounded by 18 and 10 percent respectively, although neither has returned to its pre-recession average. Growth in both measures was faster from May 2014 to May 2015 than the annualized average rate over the previous four years. Both of these factors boost aggregate overtime worker-hours. This increase in both the number of employees who work overtime and the number of average overtime hours worked emphasizes the need to ensure that workers are fairly compensated for the rising importance of overtime in our economy.
4. The share of workers who are unemployed due to job loss, as opposed to new entrants searching for a job, has returned to its pre-crisis level. The distribution of reasons for unemployment shifts with the business cycle. When overall unemployment is higher, more of the unemployed tend to have lost their previous jobs. When overall unemployment is lower, more of the unemployed are labor force entrants, either new or returning, who have begun job searches. (A third category, the fraction of unemployed who voluntarily left their jobs, is also cyclical but accounts for less of the variation.)  Over the past year, the fraction of unemployed persons who lost their jobs returned to its average level from 2005 and 2006. Notably, the distribution has stabilized over the past eight months, with the breakdown of unemployed looking much like it did before the crisis struck. However, the fraction accounted for by job losses is still above its level from the height of the late 1990s expansion. 
5. The distribution of job growth across industries generally followed recent trends in June, but some industries saw especially weak or strong months. June was an especially strong month for financial activities (+20,000), retail trade (+33,000), temporary help (+20,000), information (+7,000), and other services (+10,000). June was a weaker than usual month in construction (unchanged), wholesale trade (unchanged), utilities (unchanged), manufacturing (+4,000), and leisure and hospitality (+22,000). Across the 17 industries shown below, the correlation between the most recent one-month percent change and the average percent change over the last twelve months fell to 0.80 from 0.90 last month, but remained well above the average correlation in previous months.
As the Administration stresses every month, the monthly employment and unemployment figures can be volatile, and payroll employment estimates can be subject to substantial revision. Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is informative to consider each report in the context of other data as they become available.
Betsey Stevenson is a Member of the Council of Economic Advisers.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: