The Pardu

Archive for March 9th, 2014|Daily archive page

Thom Hartmann "The Lie of the Free Market"

In Ronald Reagan, Thom Hartmann on March 9, 2014 at 8:28 PM

A few months ago, I sought and received permission to post Thom Hartmann screeds, treatises or, if you prefer, writings on my web page. I work to avoid over use of the privilege, but the following is a must post. 

You may notice, my intent is not didactic in any way.  My intent is to continue work towards exposure of a political movement that has so obvious gone rabid. Their “free market” mantra is nothing more than a “rebel-yell” for Tip 20% (ters) and a glass ceiling for the remaining 80%; you and me.


The Lie of the Free Market by
Thom Hartmann

“Listen to the right-wing pundits–the people I call the cons–and they will tell you something completely different. They suggest (and some actually believe) that a middle class will naturally spring into being when the kingdoms of corporate power are freed from government restrictions.

“The way to create good jobs, according to the cons, is to ‘free’ the market. When business gets to do whatever it wants, they say, it will create wealth, and that wealth will trickle down to the rest of us, creating a middle class.

“The con’s belief in ‘free’ markets is a bit like the old Catholic Church’s insistence that the Earth was at the center of the solar system. The free-market line is widely believed by those in power, and those who challenge this belief are labeled heretics–and it’s wrong.

“Here’s a headline for these cons who are masquerading as economists without having studied either economics or history:

“There is no such thing as a “free” market. Markets are the creation of government.”

“Governments provide markets with a stable currency for financial transactions. They provide a legal infrastructure and court systems to enforce the contracts that make the market possible. They provide educated workforces through public education, and those workers show up at their places of business after traveling on public roads, rails, and airways provided by the government. Businesses that use the ‘free’ market are protected by police and fire departments provided by the government, and they send their communications–from phone to e-mail–over lines that follow public rights of way maintained and protected by the government.

“And, most important, the rules of the game of business are defined by the government. Any sports fan can tell you that without rules and referees football, baseball, basketball, and hockey would be a mess. Similarly, business without rules won’t work. In a corporate kingdom–a corporatocracy–those rules are made by the businesses themselves and will inevitably screw workers and citizens. In a democracy those rules are made by We the People, both through our elected representatives and through union negotiations with the business kings/lords/CEOs.

Returning to Classical Economics, Ronald Reagan’s favorite punch line was: ‘I’ve always felt the nine most terrifying words in the English language are “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.”‘

“Sure, it’s easy to laugh along and think that government is bad–until you need government. Until you’ve been taken advantage of and want to use the government court system, or you get old and sick and need Medicare, or your house catches fire and you’d like your local fire department to come by and put it out.

Reagan often used to say that the government is stealing your money. The cons love that mantra: ‘It’s your money.’

“Nobody likes to pay taxes. And nearly three decades of deceitful PR convincing Americans that there’s no need to invest in our nation–and, thus, no need to pay for it with taxes–has left us with an electorate that so hates the word tax that cons can use it to turn voters against almost anyone advocating any government program. If you’re a politician and someone calls you a ‘tax-and-spend liberal,’ that generally means ‘good-bye to your votes.’

“The cons exploit this with the ‘It’s your money’ lie. ‘It’s your money, and the liberals want it!’ shout cons on the radio. They’re talking about taxes, of course. But are our tax dollars really ‘our’ money?

“If I walk into a 7-Eleven store with a dollar in my pocket and say, ‘Gee, I’d really like that Hershey bar,’ and if I tear it open and take a bite out of it, that Hershey bar now belongs to me. And that dollar belongs to 7-Eleven, even though it’s still in my pocket. It’s pretty simple. As soon as I used the candy bar, I’d entered into an agreement to pay for it. It’s a form of a contract even though I’ve never signed anything with a convenience store in my life. It’s not my money anymore, even though it’s still in my pocket, once I take possession of the candy bar.

“We make an agreement by staying in this country that we will live by its rules.

“I get up in the morning and the lights come on because my government is regulating the local utility for both safety and reliability. (FDR had to force electric utilities to serve many communities–thus the Rural Electrification Administration.) I open the tap to brush my teeth, and the water is pure because my government has purified it and delivered it to me from miles away in a safe fashion. The toothpaste I use isn’t poisonous because the government passed laws that make it possible for aggrieved consumers to sue if they’re harmed. Its ingredients are listed because the government requires it.

“When I drive to work, the streets are paved by my government, and the streetlights work because my government planned them right and keeps them in good working order. The radio station where I broadcast from can do business because my government provides a stable currency and a framework of contract laws that allow a corporation to exist and function. The food I eat for lunch at a nearby restaurant is safe both because it was inspected at its source by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and because the local government checks our restaurants for sanitary conditions. I can eat without worrying that bandits are going to run into the restaurant and demand every body’s wallet because the police are on the job. And I can go about my day without worrying that we’ll be bombed by invaders from another country because the State Department and the U.S. Army both negotiate and protect our nation. With a little bit of thought, you can add dozens of other things to this list–all provided with taxpayer dollars.

“Living in this society and using these services is like picking up and biting into the Hershey bar at the 7-Eleven: I’ve agreed to pay for them because I live here and I use them. The form of my agreement is called taxes. Therefore the money from my paycheck that goes to pay my taxes is not my money. It’s the money I owe to cover the cost associated with the things I use each and every day. To suggest that it’s ‘my’ money is to spit in the face of our Founders–to suggest that somehow each of us is above and separate from the social contract we’ve all agreed to by living in this great nation.

“When the cons say, ‘It’s your money,’ what they really mean is that they don’t believe in the social contract. They don’t believe in paying for the services we use every day or in taking care of the poor and the sick and the elderly who can’t take care of themselves. They are anti-American, anti-democracy, anti-Christian (and anti-Jewish and anti–every other major religion) zealots. They are a danger to our democracy and our country.

“Progressive taxation has a long history. Jefferson advocated for progressive taxation in his letters to James Madison back in 1784 and 1785: ‘Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property,’ Jefferson wrote, ‘is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions of property in geometrical progression as they rise.’ In short, Jefferson said, ‘Taxes should be proportioned to what may be annually spared by the individual.’

“But the cons–who since the days when John Adams called working people ‘the rabble’ –fought back. A true middle class represented a threat to America’s aristocrats and pseudo-aristocrats because a middle class will always create a democracy. The cons would have to give up some of their power, and some of the higher end of their wealth might even be ‘redistributed’ –horror of horrors–for schools, parks, libraries, and other things that support a healthy middle-class society (but not necessarily the rich, who live in a parallel, but separate, world).

“When today’s cons make tax a dirty word, they are really saying they don’t care if the middle class gets screwed. As president, Reagan cut the top tax rate for billionaires from 70 percent to 28 percent while effectively raising taxes on working people via the payroll tax; he added insult to injury by allowing inflation to increase a whole range of taxes (sales tax, property tax, vehicle license fees, and so on) on working people. Following in that tradition, the Bush Jr. administration gave, in its first four years, tax cuts totaling almost half a trillion dollars to the best-off 1 percent of Americans.

“Even as taxes on the rich go down, they’ve gone up on the middle class (in part because they’ve gone down for the rich and somebody has to pay the cost of all the commons we use). If you made $75,000 in 2001, you saw only $350 in tax cuts from the federal government. In 2005, 80 percent of Americans got only 32 percent of the total tax-cut pie. That means the wealthiest 20 percent of Americans got 68 percent of the money the government was ‘giving back to the people.’ Unless you were making more than $218,000 a year in 2005, you got screwed by Bush’s tax cuts.

“It’s all part of the cons’ undeclared war on the middle class.”

Don’t let the Sheeplets’ mantra of “free markets” trump you anymore. Save or remember this post for future confrontations with the Sheeplets — who knows, maybe they’ll actually learn something.

International Women’s Day!

In Uncategorized on March 9, 2014 at 4:34 PM

A GOP Gazette: Nine State Maps and CPAC

In 9 Maps, Ben Carson, CPAC, GOP Minority outreach, John Hudak, Rand Paul, run!”, Sarah, Ted Cruz, The Daily Kos, Wayne LaPierre on March 9, 2014 at 3:14 PM

I quick look at the American Right from two perspectives. First, and most important, the plight of the geographic regions that support the GOP without fail and with every election.  As matter of fact, the poorest districts in the United States rural Alabama) has a history of voting GOP as if there is no alternative.

The next perspective is the annual “ooze” from CPAC.  Our focus is to show a few points about CPAC without wallowing in the complete ooze. For instance, you will not find a long video of insane staccato drivel from Sarah Palin. We would share her full keynote (Get that Keynote) address, if someone earlier in her life had sponsored Palin through an English as Second Language program. 


A picture of the American Right and its constituent base.

These 9 Maps Should Absolutely Outrage Southerners

Rep. Paul Ryan waxed eloquent at CPAC Thursday on how completely Republicans understand the American people, in stark contrast to how “the left” is offering people “a full stomach and an empty soul.” Offering children a stomach full of school lunch, to be precise. 
Ryan cited a story he heard from Eloise Anderson, who “serves in the cabinet of my buddy Scott Walker.” Anderson told Ryan of an encounter with:
… a young boy from a very poor family, and every day at school he would get a free lunch from a government program. He told Eloise he didn’t want a free lunch. He wanted his own lunch, one in a brown paper bag, just like the other kids. 
He wanted one, he said, because he knew a kid with a brown paper bag had someone who cared for him. This is what the left does not understand.
_____________________________

CPAC II

Read more after the break below

This could only go over big at a republican ooze fest!


Proud To Be A Filthy Liberal Scum

We’re loud, proud and not afraid to hurt a conservative’s feelings!

Mitch McConnell: Viagra Spokesman

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell at the zoo circus bad joke horror show Klan rally temper tantrum known as CPAC 2014 proving he’s still a man’s man.

f_dc_mccongun_140306_5d56e4713824a4ae73ab815990f596b9
Conservatives have become a parody of a parody.

_____________________________

CPAC III

Wayne LaPierre tells CPAC: True freedom is ‘all the rifles, shotguns and handguns we want’

By David Edwards
Thursday, March 6, 2014 16:10 EST Wayne LaPierre speaks to CPAC
  • 404

_____________________________


CPAC V

Ted Cruz in his ever self-aggrandizing glory spoke to rhetoric thirsty crowd. As is often the case Cruz slammed other republicans to ingratiate himself with the far-right” The CPAC crowd et al.  He apparently riled John McCain based on his use of another failed GOP presidential candidate: Bob Dole , former GOP Congressman. Wouldn’t you know, McCain retorted with respect for Dole’s war record. His angst is wasted as Cruz has in the past criticized American’s who served int he US military.  The only concern Cruz has shown for the US military was his (along with Palin and Bachmann’s) opportunist Veteran Memorial visits after they (The GOP and its Tea Party) shutdown the federal government. 


John McCain: Ted Cruz Should Apologize for CPAC Comments

_____________________________



CPAC Keynote Speaker…but, of course!

“Run, Sarah, run!” (She garnered just 2 percent in the conference’s annual presidential straw poll. 

”Mr. President,” she said, “the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.” 

“I love coming back here because there are always so many young people or, as you’re known by the folks across the river, Obamacare suckers,” she said. “Turns out, you have the change that they were waiting for: You have the $5s, the $10s, and the $20s.”  

“They said the train of history was roaring to the left,” she said, “but then, something happened. That ‘Hope and Change’ went from a catchy campaign slogan to a reality and along the way, ‘Hope and Change,’ ‘Yes we can,’ it became ‘No You Can’t’: No you can’t log on to the website. No, you can’t keep your health care. No, you can’t make a phone call without Michelle Obama knowing this is the third time you dialed Pizza Hut delivery.”

Palin apparently used a highly intellectual prop to assist with delivery of a message, to connect with the her audience. She quipped about President Obama’s “Healthcare scam;”  I will bet well over 95% of the audience is covered by some form of medical coverage (If they so chose). _____________________________

CPAC  …. And the winner is!!!!!!

One-man SHOCK POLL: Drudge declares Rand Paul “big winner” of CPAC 2014

SIREN: Drudge Declares Rand Paul ‘Big Winner’ Of CPAC 2014 Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) is the “big winner” of the 2014 Conservative Political Action Conference, conservative monolith Matt Drudge declared Saturday.

TALKING POINTS MEMO
▶ Comment

, , , , , , ,

Kochs Seek To Purchase Your Vote

In Al Sharpton, Charles and David Koch, Robert Greenwald on March 9, 2014 at 2:29 PM

Inside the Koch-backed political donor network
A political funding network as intricate as any  labyrinthian design (larger view)

Support for political campaigns is as common as breathing. After the SCOTUS gave the nation unfettered secretive campaign sponsorship via Citizens United political spending has exponentially increased. The proliferation of tax-exempt organizations funneling money into our elections is both unprecedented and obscene.

Political contributions are funneled to the Left and to Right. In fact, the Center for Responsive Politics reported President Obama out-raised Mitt Romney rather handily in the run-up to the 2012 general elections. Obama was the donations winner based on contributions from (us) “small” donors. As anticipated Romney walked away with the lion’s share of PAC contributions.

Open Secrets (Center for Responsive Politics)


Barack Obama (D) 

Mitt Romney (R)
RAISED $715,677,692 $446,135,997
SPENT $683,546,548 $433,281,516
DEBTS $7,223,153 $1,200,000
CASH
(ON HAND)
$5,397,399 $12,921,629

OVERALL
SPENDING
(SEE MORE)

BLUE TEAM
$1,107,114,464
RED TEAM
$1,238,097,161

Source of Funds

legend
legend
Small Indiv Contrib.
Large Indiv. Contrib.
$233,215,440
$489,660,089
Individual contributions $715,150,163
legend PAC contributions $0
legend Candidate self-financing $5,000
legend Federal Funds $0
legend Other $522,529

legend
legend
Small Indiv. Contrib.
Large Indiv. Contrib.
$79,806,091
$366,336,696
Individual contributions $443,363,010
legend PAC contributions $1,076,496
legend Candidate self-financing $52,500
legend Federal Funds $0
legend Other $1,643,991

When the discussion moves to political contributions, it is impossible to avoid discussion of the Right-wing “bankers”: Charles and David Koch with billionaire ‘edge-shaping’ via Sheldon Adelson and others of the Uber wealthy who would be kings. 

Pundits on the Right will frequently counter any mention of the Kochs with George Soros and organized labor as Left-wing political bankers.  

Let’s focus for a bit on the number one contributors to all things conservative: the Kochs.
The Republic Report Dot Org

So much for right-wing punditry and comparison against unions.


On March 7th Al Sharpton, MSNBC Politics Nation, broadcast a segment about the illusive and secretive Koch brothers.

http://on.msnbc.com/1dCbEJd



Robert Greenwald has created a revealing documentary about Kochs. A docu/video series for those who have little to no knowledge of two men who obviously want to reshape the nation to their beliefs systems and construct laws to facilitate their vast industrial empire. Long story short, the Kochs are plutocrats. Plutocrats who will turn your world and my world into that of pawn pieces on a chess set.


The Kochs would become the kings of the fief and will directly work to shape our world as such. Kings must have subservient pawns across their fiefdoms; that means you and me.

WIKI

The brothers advocate libertarian principles of smaller government, free-markets, deregulation, and reduction of social services. They actively fund and support organizations that contribute significantly to Republican candidates, and that lobby against universal health care and climate change legislation. They have donated more than $196 million to dozens of free-market and advocacy organizations. In 2008, the three main Koch family foundations contributed to 34 political and policy organizations, three of which they founded, and several of which they direct.

When the uber wealthy seek to buy elections and throw copious amounts of money at reshaping our society, only they win in the long run.


Koch Brothers exposed: one minute video, here.

Why do the Kochs want to end public schools?Here.
Robert Greenwald’s Koch Brothers Exposed Full Version

▶ Comment

, , ,

Jon S Randel : Blood Sunday..A Quest For The Right To Vote

In Uncategorized on March 9, 2014 at 12:19 PM

State troopers swing billy clubs to break up a civil rights march in Selma, Ala., on March 7, 1965.
State troopers swing billy clubs to break up a civil rights march in Selma, Ala., on March 7, 1965. The day would later become infamously known as “Bloody Sunday.”
AP Photo

All Jimmie Lee Jackson wanted was the right to vote.


Jackson, a deacon of the St. James Baptist Church in Marion, Alabama, had tried to register to vote without success for four years. Jackson and 500 peaceful protesters had planned a peaceful walk from the church to the county jail and back, singing hymns. Jackson never made it back to the church. They were attacked by Alabama police and state troopers and beaten with clubs. Many protesters took refuge in a cafe behind the church. There, Jackson attempted to protect his mother from being beaten when he was shot twice in the abdomen by a trooper. He was unarmed. Injured badly, he was still able to run out of the cafe, followed by the troopers who continued to club him. He died at Good Samaritan Hospital in Selma, on February 26, 1965. He was only 26 years old.

Jimmie Lee Jackson was the inspiration for the first Selma to Montgomery march that occurred a few days later, known as “Bloody Sunday.” On March 7, 1965, an estimated 525 to 600 civil rights marchers led by John Lewis were again met by state troopers and beaten with nightsticks, gassed, and trampled by mounted troopers. Immediately after “Bloody Sunday,” Dr. Martin Luther King organized a second march on Tuesday, March 9, leading 2,500 marchers to a prayer. That night, three white ministers who had come to support the march were beaten by the Ku Klux Klan, killing one of the ministers who was refused treatment at the local hospital because he supported the march.


Because of the impact of the marches, President Johnson presented a bill to Congress, saying “What happened in Selma is part of a far larger movement which reaches into every section and state of America. It is the effort of American Negroes to secure for themselves the full blessings of American life. Their cause must be our cause, too, because it is not just Negroes but really it is all of us who must overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice. And we shall overcome.” The bill was the Voting Rights Act. When Dr. King heard this speech, a tear rolled down his cheek.


Finally, on this day, March 21, 1965, Dr. King attempted to complete the march from Selma, where Jimmy Lee Jackson died, to Montgomery Alabama. The march started with close to 8,000 people. By the time, Dr. King reached the Montgomery capitol on Thursday, March 25, nearly 25,000 people were with him. Most of the participants were black, but some were white and some were Asian and Latino. Spiritual leaders of multiple races religions and faith had marched abreast with Dr. King. King delivered the speech “How Long, Not Long.” “The end we seek,” King told the crowd, “is a society at peace with itself, a society that can live with its conscience. … I know you are asking today, How long will it take? I come to say to you this afternoon however difficult the moment, however frustrating the hour, it will not be long.”


The Voting Rights Act became law on Aug. 6. 1965.
▶ Comment