The Pardu

Archive for the ‘Pay equity’ Category

Microsoft’s Nadella, Pay Equity And A Reminder Of GOP Pay Policy

In "Corporations are people, "Karma", Bill and Melinda Gates, GOP Pay Policy, Microsoft's Nadella, my friend?", Nick Hanauer, Pay equity on October 11, 2014 at 3:03 PM

Early 2009

Did someone once say “Corporations are people, my friend?” 

Did that same elitist also declare 47% of voters were of no consequence as they are bound to the Democratic Party?  Thus, declaring half of US voters of no concern to the GOP and wealthy Americans. 

Does the person who spoke the comments hold membership in a party that consistently votes against equal pay for women? 

Did that party very recently refuse to allow the Paycheck Fairness Act a US Senate vote? 

Yes, corporate America is full of elitist millionaires who have no regard for fair and equal pay. It is truly unfortunate, but there are only a few corporate CEOs and executive management teams that value progressive ideology that manifest in associated values, vision and mission.  One such billionaire is venture capitalist  Nick Hanauer and another is noted real estate mogul and financial guru Warren Buffet. The numbers are small compared to the much more common conservative who manages the nation’s mega corporations. Lest, we forget Bill and Melinda Gates  owners of Microsoft.

Did I mention Microsoft?  While the Gates’ may not appreciate categorization as a progressive corporatist, their social record away from Microsoft indicates an affinity for humane efforts to help the plight of people who have nothing and deserve a shot at an improved life (especially regarding education and life in the African Continent). I digress, but only for sake of illustration. End digression. 


This past winter (2014) Microsoft anointed this man as CEO.

      • Image result for satya nadella
      • Image result for satya nadella
      • Image result for satya nadella
      • Image result for satya nadella
      • Image result for satya nadella
      • Image result for satya nadella
  • Satya Nadella
    Executive
  • Satya Nadella is an Indian-American business executive. He is the current Chief Executive Officer of Microsoft. He was appointed as CEO on 4 February 2014, succeeding Steve Ballmer. Wikipedia

  • It took mere weeks for the CEO corporatist to adopt the Mark Zukerberg Tee-shirt/hoodie vesture (eg. the cool techie executive look). 


    After only a few months in the top chair Nadella’s inner core came forth like a blast of flatulence at the most inopportune of moments; for the whole world to see, hear and feel. 


    Huffington Post and all media are reporting on Nadella’s revealing moment.

    “He had been asked to give his advice to women who are uncomfortable requesting a raise. His response: “It’s not really about asking for the raise, but knowing and having faith that the system will actually give you the right raises as you go along.” Not asking for raise, he added, is “good karma” that would help a boss realize that the employee could be trusted and should have more responsibility.

    “Corporations are people my friend!” No the corporation is a state chartered entity that proliferates for the sole purpose of providing income to a select few while providing jobs, products or services. Its over-ridding mission according to my Masters in Business Administration professors: “To maintain its existence as an ongoing business concern.”  

    Nadella’s remarks echo the reality of disparate treatment (intentional discrimination) and disparate impact (Unintentional results from policies that result in forms of discrimination) from the corporate leaders towards certain employee demographic groups. Disparate or not, we saw this week why some refuse to ignore what we call “War on Women.” Nadella may live the life of a committed liberal (I doubt that), as his remarks remind of the liberal who will fight for equal rights, but will immediately order a home for sale sign when black family moves into the home next door.

    As should we should have anticipated, the Microsoft CEO quickly sought to cover his psyche with perfunctory apologizes and “comment reversing” Tweets.  How often have you heard similar from many dweebs caught speaking from their hearts with reticence of the resultant feedback? I offer Paul Ryan’s “Inner city culture” as a prime example and I offer many racist email, jokes and remarks throughout the past few years of an African-American progressive in the White House. 

    Al Jazeera America (headline)
    Microsoft CEO apologizes over ‘completely wrong’ women’s pay remarks

    USA TODAY


      After which Nadella issued, the ever-present and increasingly inane “walk-back.” After the perfunctory apology and issuance of “I was inarticulate,” what else is left? Social Media, of course.
      1. Was inarticulate re how women should ask for raise. Our industry must close gender pay gap so a raise is not needed because of a bias

      “I was inarticulate.” Didn’t Paul Ryan also use that phraseology?


      I have grown to view the phraseology as: “I spoke my mind, divulge my inner thoughts, and now I have no rational words to extricate myself from my psyche.” If you prefer a more brief summary try this: “OOPS.” Commonly used to cover stupidity as with Rick Perry’s debate “oops” or to cover the inadvertent flatulence you release at the most undesirable time and place. 

      The mindset is widespread and inherent to most chief executives who have reached the corporate pinnacle. A mindset that spreads down and across all corporate fissures as the “rock star” CEO is literally the corporate “god”, with all inherent deference, butt-sucking and subservience. Often the unwritten mindset outweighs compensation systems (pay and promotion) that are well meaning and architecturally developed to be fair and equitable.

      Nadella’s remarks will fade into US history as having garnered an apology and worthy of moving forward. Of course, it will the very same system of privilege works against people of color, women, white men over age 40 and the physically challenged each and every day in corporate America. If those who are ultimately responsible such as Board of Directors and major Shareholders (or private owners) do not work to extinguish placement of such people in high places we as a nation will never see the death of inequality and inequity int he workplace.

      The Microsoft CEO provided an irrefutable case for Affirmative-Action. If not forced via policy that requires government contractors and subcontractors to provide fair and equitable workplaces and policies, Nadella’s mindset rules and preservers.

      Nadella’s remarks can only be consider as “Stay in your place and do not rock the boat.”  He should learn the hard lesson most of us learned after mere months in the trenches of corporate America: There is no “Karma” below the level of executive vice-president. 

      In September, the GOP gave a deciding “NO” to allowing the Pay check Fairness Act to come up for a vote.

      var icx_publication_id = ‘14291’; var icx_copyright_notice = ‘2014 TheProgressiveInfluence’;

      Pay Equity And Women In Lowest Level Jobs; Minimum Wage And The GOP

      In GOP, JFK, Minimum wage, Pay equity, Ronald Reagan, The Obama Administration on March 12, 2014 at 11:36 AM

      Pay Equity, Minimum Wage and the woman worker…… John F. Kennedy had foresight on inequity for women in the workplace.

      “[W]e have by no means done enough to strengthen family life and at the same time encourage women to make their full contribution as citizens. If our nation is to be successful in the critical period ahead, we must rely upon the skills and devotion of all our people. … It is appropriate at this time … to review recent accomplishments, and to acknowledge frankly the further steps that must be taken. This is a task for the entire nation.”

      JohnJohn F. Kennedy

      504 – Statement by the President on the Establishment of the President’s Commission on the Status of Women.
      December 14, 1961

      _________________________

      Ah, the beauty of reflection to a time when ideology and working towards a great future was like a rose budding to blossom and casting a “hopeful” shadow across the nation. Hopeful regarding…..

      The Status of Women
          Civil Rights: “Out of Jim Crow”
             Concern for the poor and underprivileged
                 The hope of Fair Pay for women and minorities
                     Eventual War that would unleash a societal evolution
                         Booming manufacturing
                              Off-shoring jobs wasn’t on the radar screen
                                   The Kochs did not have a grip on the GOP

      And, all before the nation turned to Richard Nixon and the new GOP and 1970s neo-conservative ideology. The beautiful blossoming rose prematurely withered with the eventual election of Ronald Reagan. The Father of Modern Conservatism administered with regressive conservative ideology and policy to reverse growing social change. Reagan and his party initiated federal policy that led to (protective) moats for US industrialist. Ultimately, his economic policies fueled development of a US “income caste system.”

      Since the Reagan Era, the nation has experienced Civil and Human Rights paradigms akin to that of pre-1960s social Dark Ages. Paradigms that have metastasized with the election of Barack Obama to a social phenomenon one can only call a rebirth of unabashed racism. Racism actually practiced and broadcast by well-viewed media (Fox News) and manifest like a completely soaked sponge around the fringe of the GOP (and the libertarian movement). The socially deprived seem to use media (eg., talk radio and Fox News) to feed from the sponge as social oppression permeates to the core of US conservative ideology. The permeating sponge represents the growth of “isms” that at one time was moved to the “back-40” of the US social landscape. Did I mention pay equity, the Minimum Wage and women?

      People who practice or perpetrate “isms” carry then around in bundles. You will not find a racist who is free of homophobia. You will only rarely find a person suffering from homophobia who is free of the ravages of sexism. I further posit, you will not find a person infested with sexism who will rally around or champion fair and equal pay for women. Maybe less pronounced, but women who live in such environments know it is a reality.

      Sexism has become such a worldwide norm women’s pay equity issues in industrialized nations are completely ignored. In the United States, millions ignore the male to female pay ratio of women earning $.77 for every dollar earned by her male cohorts. Women are also guilty complacency in acceptance of pay inequity.  When women in the millions do themselves great harm when they vote for a party that cares as much about pay-equity as it cares about climate issues. Indifferent women literally enable one of US societies’ most virulent “isms.” Pay inequality with women occupying the majority of lower level jobs, and receiving the lowest levels of pay, is the epitome of sexism.

      Read more after the break below

      How is it possible the following is so easy to ignore? Let’s start with the perfect high-end example: the woman Chief Executive Officer (CEO). In the summer of 2013, Bloomberg reviewed the S&P 500 top executives and found a 17% disparity in women CEO Pay and average CEO pay.  The following table shows a mixed bag, but the message is clear. 

      If industrialist and Wall Street executives pay women at the highest levels moderately less than her male counterparts, do you think those power-brokers have concern for lower end employees?  The question is rhetorical, we know what they do and the evidence is easy to locate.
      First, know that women occupy the majority of lower paid jobs.  A look back 50 years.
      Infographic about women's issues in 1963 compared to 2013

      Women comprise 53% of the workforce. Seventy per cent of mothers work to support a family.   Since the mid 1960s, the income disparity (gap) has kept pace with increases in pay among various race and gender demographic groups. Progress in reducing the gap doe snot exist; actually the gap has every so slightly widened. The following chart unfortunately ends in 2008, but we have major suspicion the trend lines continue as delineated in the chart. Fabulous Broke Dot Com 


      Last summer the White House published a report from a National Equal Pay Task Force. 

      The conclusion? The top professions among women haven’t changed all that much over the last half century. Women are still more likely than men to work minimum-wage or low-pay service jobs. 

      In 1960, the top five leading occupations for women were private household workers, secretaries, sales clerks, elementary school teachers and bookkeepers. 

      In 2010, the leading categories haven’t changed much. The top five are secretaries, nurses, elementary and high school teachers, cashiers and retail clerks. 

      The report found male-dominated jobs that do not require higher education still often pay more than the kinds of jobs mostly taken up by women.

      A National Equal Pay Task Force table shows clear evidence of job level regression (over the past 30 years) and it shows women occupy many lower paying jobs.


      The Obama Administration has nudged pay disparity among men and actual women closer to equity, but a stubborn gap remains.

      The Society of Human Resources Management June 13, 2013


      Excerpt
      The day the Equal Pay Act was signed into law, women earned, on average, 59 cents for every dollar a man earned. “Today it’s about 77 cents,” President Obama said on June 10, 2013, in the East Room of the White House. “So, it was 59 and now it’s 77 cents. It’s even less, by the way, if you’re an African-American or a Latina.” 
      The president pressed for Congress to “step up and pass the Paycheck Fairness Act, so women have better tools to fight for equal pay for equal work.” 
      Occupational Segregation

      The pay disparity is due, in part, to women continuing to fill lower-paying jobs because of “occupational segregation.”

      The report listed the top 10 occupations women fill: 
      Secretaries and administrative assistants.
      Professional nurses.

      Elementary- and middle-school teachers.

      Cashiers.
      Retail salespersons.
      Nursing, psychiatric and home health aides.
      Waitresses.
      First-line supervisors and managers of retail salespersons.
      Customer-service representatives.
      Maids. 
      Male-dominated professions requiring a high school diploma or a bachelor’s degree or higher continue to pay more than fields with a high concentration of women. 
      For example, the three most common male-dominated jobs requiring a high school diploma—brick mason, tool and die maker, and plumber—provide average salaries of $45,410, $39,910 and $46,660, respectively.

      By contrast, the top three female-dominated jobs requiring a high school diploma—secretary, child care worker and hairdresser—offer average salaries of $34,660, $19,300 and $22,500, respectively. 

      Occupations are segregated by gender in professions requiring a bachelor’s degree or higher, the report added, and the male-dominated jobs are paid more. 
      The three most common male-dominated jobs requiring a higher-education degree—mechanical engineer, computer-control programmer and operator, and aerospace engineer—provide average salaries of $78,160, $71,380 and $97,480, respectively. 
      The top female-dominated professions requiring a higher-education degree—speech-language pathologist, occupational therapist and dietitian—provide average salaries of $66,920, $72,320 and $53,250, respectively. 

      Read more linked above 


      Since women occupy more lower paying jobs than men, even when the male has less education, isn’t that a form of disparate impact? Disparate impact is against federal Fair Employment Law. Raising the Minimum wage could seriously offset the $.77 to $1.00 female/male pay ratio.

      If the GOP is against raising the Minimum Wage, the GOP accepts unequal pay with the reality of disparate impact on women. Some prefer use of softer language, but we call that a “War on Women.”

      The war is also perpetrated against you and me. 


      We shouldn’t be forced to live and experience the reality of the graphic just above. Your daughter, wife, aunt or Grandmother shouldn’t have to labor in lowering paying jobs while being paid a wage below the poverty level. They work in jobs with male co-workers possibly earning more for doing the same job. Many women work more than one job to simply help make ends meet.   

      If 70 plus percent of survey respondents believe the Minimum Wage should be higher than $7.25 per hour and we are faced with what you have just read, how can anyone in the GOP say there is no “war on women” from the Right. 

      Why is the party on the Right so out of touch with the wishes of the American people.