The Pardu

Posts Tagged ‘HealthCare.gov’

Proof The Affordbale Act Works And Without Koch-like Paid Actors

In Uncategorized on March 16, 2014 at 11:05 PM

I Don’t Have to Worry Anymore: My Affordable, #GetCovered Story

Posted March 12, 2014
By Angele Bravo
As a 29-year-old single mom, my life revolves around my wonderful young daughter. I work hard as a temp clerk at a New Orleans mammography clinic to provide her a good life. I stay on top of my bills and I pay taxes. I’m a responsible mom.
But I haven’t had health insurance for the past three years.
My 7-year-old daughter is covered by the Louisiana Children’s Health Insurance Program, but insurance for myself was too expensive. It was scary to live without knowing what would happen if I got really sick or if I had a serious accident. I put off check-ups and I calculated how bad it would have to get before I sought medical help. With every sniffle or cough, I wondered if this was going to turn into the hospital visit that bankrupted us.
My uninsured days finally ended when a colleague at the clinic told me about the Health Insurance Marketplace. I went on HealthCare.gov and learned that I qualified for a lower premium. I was able to enroll in a Silver health plan and a dental plan for a total of less than $18 a month. Yes, less than $18!
My coverage began February 1 and I’ve already been to the doctor for a consultation.
The Affordable Care Act has brought me security to know I can get medical attention when I need to, without saving up money or worrying about how the cost will hurt my family.
I want everybody – moms, dads, college students, and anybody looking for affordable health care – to know that they have a chance to find quality coverage in their price range. In fact, 6 out of 10 uninsured Americans could get coverage for $100 or less a month.
There are only a couple of weeks left before the March 31 open enrollment deadline, so don’t delay. Get covered today.
There are simple ways to shop for coverage and enroll in a plan. You can enroll online at HealthCare.gov; over the phone at the 24/7 call center at 1-800-318-2596; or directly through an issuer, agent, or broker. You can also find in-person assistance in your community at localhelp.healthcare.gov.

Morning Java: Affordable Care Act…Kaiser Health News…. Why Insurers Cancel Policies

In Kaiser Health News, Morning Java, TPI on November 3, 2013 at 2:00 AM


Enjoy while the caffeine kicks-in!!!!

How about some Kaiser Health News information to go along with your Sumatra,  Kopi Luwak IndonesianKenya AA, Tanzanian, French Roast, Kona Coast, ‘Black Ivory’ [Thai Elephant Dong],  Jamaica Blue Mountain, Ethiopian Yirgacheffe, Costa Rican, Espresso,  Moyobama Peruvian Organic, Indonesian Blend, Coffee Latte, Kauai Blend (often bitter), Colombian Red Lips, or your Folgers 100% Colombian?

                                     Coffees of the World

Re-Blog from Kaiser Health News


Why Insurers Cancel Policies, And What You Can Do When It Happens

OCT 30, 2013
News that health insurers are ending the policies of what could be millions of Americans has rattled consumers and added to the debate over the health care law.
If you or a family member has been notified that your individual policy is being cancelled at year’s end, you may be stunned and upset.
House Republicans sparred with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius Wednesday over the cancellations, with Sebelius saying the law generally didn’t require insurers to discontinue plans if they were in effect at the time of the law’s enactment in March 2010.
No one knows how many of the estimated 14 million people who buy their own insurance are getting such notices, but the numbers are substantial. Some insurers report discontinuing 20 percent of their individual business, while other insurers have notified up to 80 percent of policyholders that they will have to change plans.
Here is a guide to help you understand the bigger picture, including why your premiums and benefits are likely to change next year and what you should consider as you shop for a new policy.
Q. Why is this happening?
A. The so-called individual market was targeted by the health care law because it didn’t work well for many people who do not get coverage through an employer, particularly those who were older or had health problems. The latter were often rejected for coverage, charged more or had their conditions excluded from coverage.  Some policies were so skimpy they provided only the barest of coverage when someone did fall ill.
Starting Jan. 1, insurers can no longer reject people who are sick or charge them more than the healthy under the Affordable Care Act. They must also beef up policies to meet minimum standards and add benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, maternity care and mental health services.
Q. Why am I getting this notice?
A. Most likely your plan didn’t meet all the standards of the federal health law.  One type of policy being discontinued by Florida Blue, for example, did not cover hospitalizations or emergency room visits and paid a maximum of $50 toward doctor visits.  It’s possible your plan also had deductibles and other potential expenses – such as copayments for doctors and hospital care — that exceeded the law’s annual out-of-pocket maximum of $6,350 for individuals or $12,700 for families. Insurers may have just decided to end certain types of policies, something they have always had the ability to do. Some policies that fail to meet the law’s standards can still be sold, but only if the insurer decides to continue them and they are “grandfathered,” meaning you purchased one before March 2010 and neither you nor the insurer has made any substantial change since then.  Adjusting an annual deductible, which many people do each year to keep down their premiums, is a change that could end grandfathered status.
Q. How are insurers picking policies to discontinue?
A. Some consumers fear they are being targeted because they are unhealthy or otherwise unprofitable for an insurance company. Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger said insurers can only discontinue entire blocks of business and cannot simply pick and choose certain customers to cancel.  Those whose policies are canceled can sign up instead for a new plan and can’t be rejected because of their health. Insurers say they are ending policies that don’t meet the law’s standards or were not grandfathered. And some of those are profitable plans: Kaiser Permanente in California, for example, says the biggest block of policyholders losing their current coverage were enrolled in a popular $4,000 deductible plan with no maternity benefits that was doing so well that they had not had to raise rates in several years. They actually had to send rebates to policyholders last year under a provision of the health law that requires insurers to spend at least 80 percent of enrollees’ premiums on medical care or issue rebates. (KHN is not affiliated with Kaiser Permanente).
 Q. My insurer says if I renew before the end of the year, I can keep my current plan. What does this mean?
A.  In some states, insurers are offering selected policyholders a chance to “early renew,” meaning they can continue their existing plan through next year, even if it doesn’t meet all the law’s standards.  If you choose this option, your premium may still go up, but the cause would be medical inflation, rather than the need to add benefits because of the health law.  Not all states allow early renewals. Fearing insurers would offer such renewals only to their most profitable plans, a handful of states, including Illinois, Missouri and Rhode Island, barred insurers from doing it.
Q. Why are premiums changing?
A. Under the old rules, insurers could decide whether to accept you – and how much to charge — based on answers to dozens of medical questions. You no longer have to fill out those forms. Starting Jan. 1, insurers can no longer charge women more than men, reject people who are sick or charge them more and can charge older people only three times more than younger ones. They’re also adding new benefits.
As they drew up the rates for 2014, insurance firms had to make educated guesses about how many customers would stay, how many new ones they would attract – and what the health conditions of those new members might be.  Actuaries say the new rules on how much insurers may vary rates level the playing field, making premiums more of an average. Older buyers or those who had above-average health problems – and whose former rates reflected those problems – may find their premiums going down. Younger or healthier people, on the other hand, may find premiums going up, sometimes sharply.  Under the new rules, consumers “are not paying based on their own health status, but an average health status,” said Robert Cosway, an actuary with consulting firm Milliman. “The positive side is that people in poor health won’t have to pay as much, but the way you get there is that people in better health have to pay more.”

Q. I don’t qualify for a subsidy, and my premium is going way up for what the insurer tells me is a comparable policy. Why is that?
A. Insurers base premiums on a number of factors, including medical inflation and the cost of implementing insurance rules. A report on the California market done by Cosway at Milliman estimated that medical inflation and changes from the health law could add about 30 percent to the average premium in California. The biggest chunk of the increase was attributed to insurers being required to accept everyone, even those who are ill. That requirement polls well with the public. But it makes insurers nervous because they can no longer reject the costliest patients. While consumers like George Anders of California says he supports the concept, he’s not happy that his current plan is being discontinued. Anders, a contributing writer for Forbes and author of  a critique of HMOs called Health Against Wealth, said the premiums for a new policy that covers him, his wife and two children will about double, although his annual deductible may go down.  “As a social policy, I’m glad to see everyone get coverage, but if you’re going to add cost to the system, I’d like to see it spread equitably,” perhaps through an across-the-board tax, rather than just hitting policyholders, he said.
Q. I’m healthy. Why do I have to pay for people who are sick?
A.  Except for a fortunate few, everyone is likely to develop some kind of health problem or face an accident sometime in their lives. Policy experts and regulators say insurance works best when it spreads risk across a large group of people. Your house may not burn down this year, but you pay for insurance coverage just in case.
Q. I’m a single man, why do I have a plan with maternity coverage?
A. Again, it’s about spreading the risk. Men may not need maternity care, but women don’t need treatment for prostate cancer and those costs are baked into the rates, too.  Older men, and women past child-bearing age, are more likely to need treatment for heart disease, artificial hips or other illnesses that younger men and women are less likely to need. “The whole concept of insurance is you can’t just pick and choose the benefits you want,” said Praeger.  If people – especially older ones – get premiums based solely on what they might need, she said, “it could cost a whole lot more.”
Q. What if it turns out they’ve charged too much for the new coverage?
A. Under the health law, insurers who fail to spend at least 80 percent of their premium revenue on medical care have to issue rebates to consumers. Those rebates for 2014 policies won’t be seen until 2015, however.
Q. I’ve gotten this notice, what should I do now?
A.  Experts say people should scrutinize the terms of their soon-to-be-discontinued policy and compare them with what new policies offer. The monthly premium is just one factor in cost. Also note the deductible. Is it per person?  What is the maximum deductible if two or more family members fall ill in the same year? Finally, note the annual out-of-pocket cap, which is the maximum you pay in deductibles and co-payments for medical care during the year.
“People need to be aware of their range of options,” said Cori Uccello, senior health fellow at the American Academy of Actuaries. Direct comparisons may be difficult, she warned, as the new policies will often cover a wider range of benefits, but you should be able to compare deductibles and copayments for various services, including drugs.
Some insurers are recommending new plans that are most similar to the one being discontinued, and could automatically enroll you in such a plan if you take no action. Those are not your only options. You should double-check and compare a range of plans, experts say.  An independent broker can show you plans from various carriers. You can also check your state’s online marketplace or log onto or call healthcare.gov, the website serving 36 states that opted not to create their own marketplaces. While consumers are having trouble creating accounts through healthcare.gov, the website now allows shoppers to browse health plans without creating an account. When browsing, however, be aware that the premiums are not actual quotes because they do not reflect your exact age.  Nor do they show subsidies, although several online calculators—including some on state marketplace websites and another by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation can give you a good idea of how much you might receive toward coverage, based on your income. (Kaiser Health News is an editorially independent program of the foundation.)

John McAfee Accused Of Murder And Invited To Appear At GOP Healthcare.gov Hearing!

In GOP, The Hill on October 22, 2013 at 9:00 PM

Potential GOP Hearing Committee witness on Healthcare.gov?
Apparently, sometime last week congressional staffer, Sean Hayes, counsel with the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, reached-out to an attorney for John McAfee to testify about failures of the ACA website: HealthCare.gov. 

Before we visit the latest on McAfee as an accused murder suspect, we thought we would post a couple of images from a Spanish language website: Codigo Cero.

JPEG - 142.2 KB 
JPEG - 160.2 KB

We make no judgments about Mr. McAfee, but it is impossible to avoid a bit of consideration that may fall into the realm of “unsavory characters.”  He appears to have an affinity for weaponry that could qualify for a NRA spokesperson.  

Why does the GOP seem to always reach to the ‘wild-side’ for subject matter experts? 


John McAfee fugitive.

 ABC News….. 
Software Billionaire John McAfee Wanted for Questioning in Murder

Police want to talk to anti-virus software mogul about killing of his neighbor in Belize.
11/13/2012



http://abcnews.go.com/GMA…….













Software pioneer is wanted for questioning in the killing of a U.S. citizen in Belize.

12/13/2012

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA……

If I were a curious sort, and I am, wondering just how the GOP came-up with McAfee as a subject matter experts is an intriguing thought. Let’s put aside the fact the GOP may have reached out to a person who happens to be a “not yet convicted” murderer. He has not been tried for murder and convicted, but he certainly has a recent past of running like a fugitive to avoid detention.  
McAfee also appears to have a Ted Nugent like crush on firearms.  That fact alone may place tarnish his credibility as an unbiased witness.
The Hill published a piece earlier today with details related to GOP seeking McAfee as a Hearing Committee witness. While we question the GOP choice of potential witness, we will readily seeking the likes of McAfee is no surprise. 

____________ UPDATE_____________
You may have noticed above, a curiosity as to what Sean Hayes reached-out to John McAfee, of all people, as an expert witness related to   the failures of the Affordable Care Act website.  As I closed out my night, and will watching a rerun segment of the Rachel Maddow Show, “the light shone” filling in the blank. The answer is no surprise at all. Apparently, Fox News was first to reach for the less than savory McAfee. What do right-wing politicians do when Limbaugh or Fox news leads the way? They follow like Solyent Green sycophants.
The following segment is a bit long, but it is laced with a background on McAfee that induces even deeper wonderment about a Congressional aid’s outreach.  If you are short on time, view the following at the 14:30 minute mark. If you have a few minutes to spare you might want to view the entire segment. It sheds revealing light on the American Right.

Need say no more…….

The Affrodable Care Act Website, Failures Without Palatable Answers

In Affordable Care Act, Bloomberg Business Week, BuzzFeed, HHS, President Obama, The Center for Responsive Politics on October 21, 2013 at 10:26 AM

        

As watch the roll-out of the Affordable Care Act, it is impossible to avoid a degree of dissatisfaction with open enrollment and systems tools to facilitate coverage. It does not matter that we are receiving reports of 17 million unique hits to the website, and 560,000 calls to the call (assistance) center, a web based system that has failed such a critical program is unacceptable.

USA Today reported last Thursday, the site was developed with 10 year old technology. Is it possible the ACA now plagued with a failing of government procurement: the low contract bid? It does not appear low bid is the problem, but it is disconcerting to find the company contracted to develop the ACA enrollment system has a long history with the Bush Administration. CGI has reported $2.4 billion in information technology (IT) projects since its first contracts during the early years of the Bush Administration. The Washington Post provides a look at how CGI via two US acquisitions strategically positioned itself for lucrative government contractors (including the ACA contract).


CGI Federal is a relative newbie on the U.S. government IT contracting scene. It bought the U.S. contractor American Management Systems in 2004, but only started ramping up business after 2008, and accelerated in 2010 with the $1.1 billion acquisition of U.S.-based military IT contractor Stanley Inc. That sent its contracting work through the roof:
CGI Federal’s contracting volume over the years. (USASpending.gov) 
Still, CGI is only the 29th largest federal IT contractor, with about $950 million in contracts in 2012, compared to number one Lockheed Martin’s $14.9 billion. They also don’t make high-profile weapons systems, but rather the guts of government Web sites that rarely bear their names.
If you notice the graph above starts in year 2001, we offer this: “No, we are not “laying it on Bush.” We are questioning the wisdom and effectiveness of federal government procurement via ‘letting’ the contract to CGI without proper scrutiny for stakeholder in Washington DC. We do not hesitate to posit accordingly, despite the fact CGI has assisted in development of various state ACA websiteState ACA websites are a far different project than a system to accommodate enrollment for million should the demand exist. Someone in the Administration did not practice proper contractor relationships including periodic checks, forced last minute modifications, failed at validating system testing, and system corrections.


An NBC news segment from last Thursday provides sad details of the failed CGI project.
 The broadcast segment also clearly states there were warnings. Warnings that apparently went unheeded, and most assuredly went investigated; thus more criticism of some entity in the project management team at HHS.

 

Some writers are questioning the wisdom of awarding such a critical contract to a company that has a history of donating heavily to the GOP. While CGI has a history of donating to Democrats as well as Republicans, The Center for Responsive Politics reveals in 2012 CGI contributed $184,700 527 committees. The contribution breakdown is as follows:

Top Recipients
Recipient Total From Indivs From Orgs
 Republican Governors Assn $147,700 $0  $147,700
 Democratic Governors Assn $35,000 $0   $35,000
The Center for Responsive Politics offers more details related political CGI contributions. In fairness, we will state CGI contributes on a more bi-partisan basis when consideration is given to individual politicians.  Here are other writers who are not only not being “fair”, some are suggesting a lack of effort to deliver an effective system for political reasons. We will not go there, just yet.
As indicated by BuzzFeed, the problem is not so much patronage and political subterfuge related to CGI, the problem is that of the federal government contractor.  Where have we witness problem related to contractors int he recent past? Edward Snowden was released from contract with the CIA, only to successfully completed his espionage mission via the NSA. 
In any case, the ACA enrollment system is flawed (to say the least).  The Administration has posted a brief summary of their efforts to make improvements( posted it below).


Site Tags: 


Sunday, October 20, 2013

Over the past two and a half weeks, millions of Americans visited HealthCare.gov to look at their new health care options under the Affordable Care Act. In that time, nearly half a million applications for coverage have been submitted from across the nation. This tremendous interest – with over 19 million unique visits to date to HealthCare.gov– confirms that the American people are looking for quality, affordable health coverage, and want to find it online.
Unfortunately, the experience on HealthCare.gov has been frustrating for many Americans. Some have had trouble creating accounts and logging in to the site, while others have received confusing error messages, or had to wait for slow page loads or forms that failed to respond in a timely fashion. The initial consumer experience of HealthCare.gov has not lived up to the expectations of the American people. We are committed to doing better. 
Aside from the difficulties since launching the site, there are parts of the overall system that have proved up to the task. The “Data Hub,” component, which provides HealthCare.gov with information that aids in determining eligibility for qualified health plans, is working. Individuals have been able to verify their eligibility for credits, enabling them to shop for and enroll in low or even no-cost health plans.

WHAT HAPPENED – WHAT WE ARE WORKING ON
Since launch, when we first recognized these issues, we have been working around the clock to make improvements. We have updated the site several times with new code that includes bug fixes that have greatly improved the HealthCare.gov experience. The initial wave of interest stressed the account service, resulting in many consumers experiencing trouble signing up, while those that were able to sign up sometimes had problems logging in.
In response, we have made a number of improvements to the account service. Initially, we implemented a virtual “waiting room,” but many found this experience to be confusing. We continued to add more capacity in order to meet demand and execute software fixes to address the sign up and log in issues, stabilizing those parts of the service and allowing us to remove the virtual “waiting room.” Today, more and more individuals are successfully creating accounts, logging in, and moving on to apply for coverage and shop for plans. We’re proud of these quick improvements, but we know there’s still more work to be done. We will continue to conduct regular maintenance nearly every night to improve the experience.

TECH SURGE
To ensure that we make swift progress, and that the consumer experience continues to improve, our team has called in additional help to solve some of the more complex technical issues we are encountering.

Our team is bringing in some of the best and brightest from both inside and outside government to scrub in with the team and help improve HealthCare.gov. We’re also putting in place tools and processes to aggressively monitor and identify parts of HealthCare.gov where individuals are encountering errors or having difficulty using the site, so we can prioritize and fix them. We are also defining new test processes to prevent new issues from cropping up as we improve the overall service and deploying fixes to the site during off-peak hours on a regular basis.
Most importantly, we want to hear from you, and make sure that your experience with HealthCare.gov is a positive one. If you have any comments, either complimentary or critical, please let us know by sharing your feedback at https://www.healthcare.gov/connect/. We’ve already heard so many stories of individuals getting health insurance for the first time, and we are dedicated to making that possible for all Americans.
We also await President Obama’s comments later today regrading the ACA, improvements and, we are certain, serious words about his concerns for the system failures.
Meanwhile, Bloomberg Business Week published a piece last week Friday, that has garnered our attention and appears to coincides with our concern for systems issues and contractual arrangements necessary for completion of government programs.

The Affordable Care Act Moves Forward! Connect The Dots Has Our Backs

In Connect The Dots, GOP Obstruction, Medicaid Expansion, The Affordable Care Act on October 19, 2013 at 9:10 AM

The Affordable Care Act open enrollment is rolling along well in some states and not so well in other states.  Do you know the missing link between “working well” and “not working so well?” States that setup marketplace exchanges (as provisioned by the ACA) are experiencing far less enrollment issue than states did not setup-up state exchanges.  
A Primer to the State Exchanges: States have either implemented a state run health insurance exchange, or let the federal government run the health insurance exchange for them. Some states have taken a variation on the approach by partnering with another state or the federal government. No matter what approach your State took the way you shop for insurance is the same. Find your State’s marketplace now and fill out an application for coverage that starts as early as January 1st, 2014. 
• Sometimes health insurance exchanges are called health insurance marketplaces.
• The official health insurance marketplace for State’s not running their own exchange is www.healthcare.gov  See more
GOP Obstruction and insane resistance the provision of the ACA, has provide fruit for powerful plutocrats like the Koch brothers.  After, shelling out over $200 million in support of  “repeal or defund”  The brother from Kansas suit find a degree of satisfaction in ACA website issues. 

Connect The Dots has continued its stellar Obamacares education campaign via another information laden Facebook post.   The developer of the page points a finger at the core of enrollment problems and provides an opportunity to get around the problem in a few states where the GOP refused to setup an ACA exchange. 

As you view the image that follows, Connect also includes vital information about Medicaid Expansion: a key component of the ACA

Connect The Dots

If you live in one of the states setting up their own health insurance exchange (indicated by an “S” and one of the “P”s on this map), you can also bypass the jammed up HealthCare.gov federal site.


Here are the direct links for those states:
http://www.healthcare.gov/what-is-the-marketplace-in-my-state
California: http://www.coveredca.com/
Colorado: http://www.connectforhealthco.com/
Connecticut: http://www.accesshealthct.com/
District of Columbia: http://dchealthlink.com/
Hawaii: http://www.hawaiihealthconnector.com/
Idaho: http://www.yourhealthidaho.org/
(for enrollment this year, using http://www.healthcare.gov/)

The current problems with enrollment in states where Governors towed the GOP party-line or edict via refusal to setup an exchange will be resolved.  The ACA will move forward in some form despite GOP obstruction. The real tragedy is, there are people who need healthcare in states where the GOP governors have refuse to provide a website exchange.

Quick look at states with the highest level of uninsured (in 2009) has much in common with the states depicted via the Connect The Dots Facebook page.

2009

Percentage of people without health insurance coverage by state, according to the United States Census Bureau(2009).[1]

  20–27%
  16–20%
  14–16%
  10–14%
  4–10%

A sad state of affairs when the highest need existing states led by the GOP and with constituents who consistently vote Republican. 

ACA enrollment issues related to “back-end” Insurance providers must be fixed and fixed damned fast. Back-end problems are inexcusable to be frank, and should have the highest of priorities in bringing the problem to an end. 

White House: White Board Health Care Reforrm

In Obamacare on September 27, 2013 at 10:55 AM

White House White Board: What Obamacare Means for You

The Affordable Care Act – also known as Obamacare – means better coverage for those who already have health insurance, and more options for those who don’t, including a new way to shop for affordable, high-quality coverage.

Watch the latest White House White Board to learn more about what the law means for you.